Remember if you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem.Buy Alice: Madness Returns™ – PC – EA EA Play FIFA 23 F1™ 22 Madden NFL 23 Apex Legends Battlefield™ 2042 The Sims 4 I seen some stupid stuff in the history pages of '2004 Ukrainian child pornography raids', that was equivalent to people for and against LSM fighting over whether it should stay or be deleted which is against wiki's rules. Please don't add any unverifiable info that will cause deletion either. All I'm saying is unless there is a real reason to delete any of this or antagonize the article, please talk about first on this talk page. The once LS Magazine article is now filed under '2004 Ukrainian child pornography raids' 2004 Ukrainian child pornography raids That article generally has no relevance to this article besides legal issues that are stated. This is not recreation of deleted material, even though many things are the same as some material that was deleted. This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions, although in this case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy deletion criteria, may apply when no criterion applies, the recreated page may not be speedied, but may be submitted to Articles for deletion or the appropriate XfD process.' Before deleting again, the admin should ensure that the material is substantially identical and not merely a new article on the same subject. A substantially identical copy, by any title, of a page that was deleted as a result of a discussion in Articles for deletion or another XfD process, unless it was undeleted per the undeletion policy or was recreated in the user space. I would also like to inform anyone who wants to use 'speedy deletion' on this article because of 'Recreation of deleted material. Hopefully people can enjoy this new article and won't throw it away as trash. Which was mispelled, don't believe me? Buy a Ukrainian newspaper that had the advertisements in it. I've seen this many times before on the history and talk page of 'LS Magaizine'. But many people who are biased, will first delete the entire thing and say that I had no sources. Also this is the most unbiased and socially acceptable article on LSM that I have seen so far. Every one has mispelled the LS-Studio's and LS-Magazine's company names by not entering hyphens. I made this page for the sole purpose that no one else has.

Ls child magazine dasha anya